When the Umpire is also a Player: Bias in Private Label Product Recommendations on E-commerce Marketplaces
(FAccT) Do Amazon private label products get an unfair share of recommendations and are therefore advantaged compared to 3rd party products?
- from
- Audit Algorithms
- added
- 2026-10-10
- likes
- 0
similar
-
Auditing Yelp’s Business Ranking and Review Recommendation Through the Lens of Fairness arxiv.org
(Arxiv) Audits the fairness of Yelp’s business ranking and review recommendation systems, with demographic parity, exposure, and statistical tests such as quantile linear and logistic regression.
-
An Empirical Analysis of Algorithmic Pricing on Amazon Marketplace mislove.org
(WWW) (Code) Develops a methodology for detecting algorithmic pricing, and use it empirically to analyze their prevalence and behavior on Amazon Marketplace.
-
FairLens: Auditing black-box clinical decision support systems sciencedirect.com
(Information Processing & Management) Presents a pipeline to detect and explain potential fairness issues in Clinical DSS, by comparing different multi-label classification disparity measures.
-
The Fair Game: Auditing & debiasing AI algorithms over time cambridge.org
Jouarnal of Cambridge Forum on AI: Law and Governance
-
AI Fairness 360 github.com
Fairness metrics for datasets and ML models, explanations, and algorithms to mitigate bias in datasets and models.
-
CFA Institute Bias Detection github.com
Claude skill for bias detection in investment analysis. Apache 2.0.
Audit Algorithms › Papers > 2021: “(FAccT) Do Amazon private label products get an unfair share of recommendations and are therefore advantaged compared to 3rd party products?”